Wednesday, January 30, 2013

The New York Times


I generally don’t consult the New York Times for my news information. It’s not because I have anything against the New York Times or because I terribly despise it. I don’t read the New York Times simply because there are so many other resources to get the news from and I only have so much time. Obviously though, this class necessitates the reading of the New York Times and therefore I have been reading it regularly, both online and in print. Although I prefer the online version of the New York Times to the print edition, I began to rely on the printed version of the Times after my ten-articles-a-month deal expired. Luckily the residence halls provide copies of major newspapers and I am able to conveniently pick up the current edition in the lobby.
         The stories published in the New York Times do not appear to be exceptionally unique. They report on breaking news in both the local, national, and global level. Of course the Times dedicates the most amount of space in their publication to the day’s most influential events, but they also include sections on opinion, entertainment, fashion, dining, health, politics, and everything in between. The stories I have paid the most attention to are the ones located on the front page. I focus on these stories the most because of their popularity and because they generally impact society more than petty articles about new panda bears at the county zoo. Focusing solely on the major articles means I miss out on many other tidbits of information that may prove valuable to a certain population. What if my favorite animal was the panda and I wanted to visit these new pandas at the zoo? In any case, reading the New York Times, whether in print or online, really hasn’t influenced my reading, writing, or working habits. I would still be able to read the news without the Times.
        


Where I Get My News


It is difficult for me to comprehend how certain people are clueless as to what’s going on in the world; the affinity of resources available for gathering news information provides society with plenty of opportunities to educate themselves. I find myself utilizing the Internet as my primary news source. My favorite news websites include BBC News, Politico, Fox News, MSNBC, and the Foundry. Yes, you read that correctly: I enjoy both Fox News and MSNBC. I enjoy using a wide variety of websites to learn about the day’s events because I appreciate opposing opinions. I also fear falling into the trap of confirmation bias. By viewing all sides of a particular issue I am able to keep an open mind and decide for myself what I believe. BBC News also makes my list of frequently visited websites because they offer thorough coverage of world events. As an international studies major I love learning about the big events happening around the world.
            The Internet provides endless amounts of information on everything from what Kim Kardashian wore at the Nugget’s game to the recent bombings in Syria, but it is important to realize that I get a lot of my information from what I hear people saying around me. Just by walking in the halls of Sturm I am able to learn that Professor Smucky grades tests poorly, the weather for Wednesday looks beautiful, and integrating logarithmic functions requires base e. Sometimes I learn things I never wanted to know in the first place. For example, do I really want to know the kissing capabilities of some random stranger? No. But this involuntary eavesdropping also provides me with quick snippets of information that I can further research on my own. I can walk through Sturm, hear a brief conversation regarding today’s shooting in Arizona, and quickly whip out my phone to pursue this emerging news story more.
            Besides the Internet and other people, the radio, TV, and physical newspapers also provide a source for gathering news. Personally, however, I utilize the Internet and other people most frequently to get my news.

Extended Essay #1: Readers of Efficiency


Hannah Szabo
Professor Leake
Readers of Efficiency
            The first written language known to man emerged over five thousand years ago in modern-day Iraq. The written symbols, known as cuneiform script, came from the Sumerians and consisted of pictograms engraved onto clay tablets with a sharpened reed. The clay tablets were then baked hard in an oven (About). Cuneiform script began as a method for recording information about taxes and crops, but it eventually became used for trade, astrological, and leisure related purposes (Writing). The ancient Sumerian process of cuneiform writing required a tedious attention to detail and a significant amount of time. Hard slabs of clay must be formed into tablets, reeds must be diligently sharpened, pictograms must be carved legibly, and finally the tablets must be baked in order for complete cuneiform communication. Due to the enormous variety of pictograms in the cuneiform script, a strict attention to detail necessitated effective writing. Eventually the evolution of the cuneiform script provided for a quicker writing practice. For example, the number of pictograms was reduced from fifteen hundred to six hundred, and the pictograms transitioned into a phonological alphabet (The Evolution). The Sumerian cuneiform language, although not prevalent today, initiated the start of many other written languages. Today the world is home to more than sixty-eight hundred languages, although not all are written (International). In any case, the evolution of written communication begins an interesting topic for describing the conditions of current-day reading and writing. I argue the emergence of literary-related technology, the printing press, typewriter, and computer, creates a society dependent on efficiency, ultimately resulting in a population living in a self-help world.  Before I begin to argue my point I find it useful to first define literacy in order to explore the connection between technological literary improvements and the development of a self-help society.
 Literacy can be thought of as a skill acquired through various means and for various reasons that allows for effective written communication between social groups or institutions. Additionally it can be thought of as the formal and fundamental process by which society communicates. Two important factors in these definitions of literacy must be highlighted. First, literacy contains a social component. Literacy scholar and esteemed psychology professor at the Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York Sylvia Scribner says it best when she states, “Literacy abilities are acquired by individuals only in the course of participation in socially organized activities with written language” (Scribner 8). Scribner’s statement refers to the fact that without a social aspect an individual lacks the resources needed to become literate. There would be no need for communication in a world of isolation. Interaction between individuals provides the foundation for which literacy prospers. Second, literacy functions as a means of communication. Communication through literacy allows individuals to transfer information, instructions, ideas, beliefs, and feelings. This transfer of information occurs through language written by one person and read by another. The social aspect and communicative purpose of literacy intertwine with one another and thus provide a clear definition of this abstract topic. A precise delineation of the word will help facilitate the remainder of this essay as we investigate how efficient literary technology has crippled the need for interpersonal assistance.
The vast improvements of literary technology seen between the Sumerians of 3000 B.C. and the world of 2013 A.D. highlight the value placed on the concept of efficiency. This process of modern technological improvement can be divided into three main events each showcasing a newer, quicker, and more efficient way to engage in literacy. These technological improvements include the printing press, typewriter, and computer.
The printing press’s invention in the mid fifteenth century allowed for pieces of literature to be produced in mass quantities. Invented by Johannes Gutenberg in Germany, the printing press was the first technology involving movable type (Inventor). With the ease of simply restructuring letters onto a mold, multiple copies of the same document could quickly be produced. The previous method of generating literature required a penman to carefully write each character one at a time, wasting an unnecessary amount of time transferring individual characters by hand. The printing press both highlights and initiates the value of efficiency because it reduced the amount of time required to produce a book.
The availability of literature increased with the invention of the printing press, and people gained greater access to books. The demand for all varieties of books grew: almanacs became increasingly popular, romance novels abounded, and printed musical books transpired (Renaissance). Society began to self educate in the era of the printing press as access to literature proliferated. Complete reliance on others to accommodate learning was no longer necessary; the purchase of an inexpensive almanac replaced the consultation of those with higher education. It is here that we see the start of a self-help society as a result of greater productivity via the printing press.
Within four hundred years the advent of the typewriter further pushed society into a mindset focused on efficiency. In an effort to combat his striking employees at the Western Union Telegraph Company, Christopher Sholes set out on a mission to create a machine able to automatically print letters and numbers with the stroke of a key. Approved and patented in 1871, Sholes’s typewriter sped up daily life and revolutionized business (The Earliest). Everything from legal rulings to graduation requirements began to rely on the typewriter. While the printing press mainly allowed for effective copying of books, the typewriter allowed for the effective printing of almost all literature mediums, and much of society viewed the typewriter as the quickest method for writing literature.
As with the printing press, the typewriter further increased the convenience of collecting information because the usefulness of this new machine produced literature at staggeringly fast speeds. In direct accordance to economic theory, the increase in productivity via the typewriter drove down the costs of books. Both the wealthy as well as the poor could educate themselves with books. People relied more on their own methods of date gathering to overcome an issue or better their daily lives than they did on others. Again we see society embodying self-help characteristics as they expanded their libraries and knowledge base.
The next technology to emerge, the computer, most thoroughly encompasses the ideals of efficiency in the modern age. Although the advent of the computer cannot be attributed to a specific inventor or pinpointed to a specific time, the emergence of the first commercial computer, the UNIVAC, in 1951 initiated change among society. The UNIVAC computer gave institutions the tools needed to foster an increasing reliance on efficiency. Businesses and government now trusted their UNIVAC device to gather and organize items such as defense intelligence and payroll applications (Trueman). Society’s need for speed escalated as computers developed and the Internet materialized into what we have in 2013. Evidence for the Internet’s popularity abounds. After a quick Google search I discovered that seventy-six percent of the United State’s population uses the Internet regularly and an individual Internet user will visit over twenty-six hundred different websites per month (Smith). The abundance of material available on the Internet developed readers who desire quick snippets of information over detailed articles. Dissatisfied with time consuming reading, readers prefer to “take in information the way the Net distributes it: in swiftly moving streams of particles” (Carr 1). The New York Times, for example, recently replaced pages two and three of their daily paper with quick summaries of news headlines instead of regular length articles. When asked the rational behind the decision to drastically reduce the length of these articles, design director Tom Bodkin said that these shortcuts “would give the harried reader a quick taste of the day’s news, sparing them the less efficient method of actually turning the pages and reading the articles” (Carr 4). Shockingly, I relate to this new mode of information gathering as well. I find myself preferring “The World this Week” section, which gives highlights of the week’s events in the beginning of The Economist, to reading the full-length articles. Of course, I read “The World this Week” via my online Economist subscription or with my iPhone app so that I am able to access this information at my leisure. I also prefer the condensed summaries found on Twitter when wanting to learn about the newest updates in the lives of my fellow tweeters. These examples give clear insight into the relationship society has with efficiency.   
The increasing production efficiency of literature, whether the literature came from the printing press in the fifteenth century, the typewriter in the nineteenth century, or the Internet of the Information Age, correlates to the increasing accessibility of literature. The increase in available literature deepens society’s reliance on efficiency and self-help. The need for personal interaction with others dwindles as escalating quantities of information become available with a simple Google search. Why would I need to pay to visit a doctor to ask him how to alleviate my sunburn when I can ask the Webmd.com? Or why should I call my mom to ask her the proper way to sew a button back onto my blouse when YouTube can give me videos explaining, step-by-step, how to sew? Pretty much any tidbit of information can be found on the Internet, and therefore reliance on others evolves into a more efficient culture of self-help.
From the printing press to the Internet, distribution of literature has changed drastically. More efficient methods of producing books and publishing information resulted in a society where an emphasis on gathering the most amount of information in the quickest amount of time becomes king. With so much data available at our fingertips it is no wonder why people lessen their dependence on others and begin depending more on their own ability to find information to overcome an issue. Relationships with machines seem to dominate relationships with people. Whether this progression into a self-help world turns out to be for the better, well, we have yet to find out.













Works Cited
"About Cuneiform Writing." Penn Museum . University of Pennsylvania Museum of
Archaeology and Anthropology, Web. 25 Jan. 2013.
<http://www.penn.museum/games/cuneiform.shtml>.
Carr, Hedges. "Is Google Making Us Stupid." Atlantic Monthly July 2008: 4. Web. 28 Jan.
2013. <http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google.>.
"International Mother Language Day." United Nations Educational, Scientific, and
Cultural Organization. United Nations, 2004. Web. 25 Jan. 2013.
<http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-html>.
"Inventor of the Week." Lemelson MIT. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Aug. 
2004. Web. 26 Jan. 2013. <http://web.mit.edu/invent/index.html>.
"Renaissance: Printing and Thinking." Annenberg Learner. Annenberg
Foundation, 2003. Web. 30 Jan. 2013. <http://www.learner.org/interactives/renaissance/printing.html>.
Scribner, Sylvia. "Literacy in Three Metaphors." American Journal of Education 93
(1984): 6-21. Print.
Smith, Catharine. “Internet Usage Statistics: How We Spend Our Time Online
(INFOGRAPHIC).” Huffington Post. 22 June 2010. Web. 29 Jan. 2013.
"The Earliest Writing Machines." Early Office Museum. Early Office Museum, 2012. Web.
26 Jan. 2013. <http://www.officemuseum.com/>.
“The Evolution of Cuneiform Script.” Ancient History Encyclopedia. Web. 25 Jan. 2013.
<http://www.ancient.eu.com/article/167//>.
Trueman, Chris. "Computers." History Learning. History Learning Site, 2012. Web. 28 Jan.
2013. <http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/computers.htm>.
"Writing." Mesopotamia . The British Museum , Web. 25 Jan. 2013.
<http://www.mesopotamia.co.uk/writing/home_set.html>.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Draft


Hannah Szabo
Extended Essay #1
Draft Due: January 27, 2013

Note: I have developed a serious case of writers block in the process of writing this paper. I am unsure of how to further organize the structure. So feedback on the structure would be wonderful so I am able to finish this! Thanks and my apologies that this draft is not completely finished.
Readers of Efficiency
            The first written language known to man emerged over five thousand years ago in modern-day Iraq. The written symbols, known as cuneiform script, came from the Sumerians and consisted of pictograms engraved onto clay tablets with a sharpened reed. The clay tablets were then baked hard in an oven (About). Cuneiform script began as a method for recording information about taxes and crops, but it eventually became used for trade, astrological, and leisure related purposes (Writing). The ancient Sumerian process of cuneiform writing required a tedious attention to detail and a significant amount of time. Hard slabs of clay must be formed into tablets, reeds must be diligently sharpened, pictograms must be carved legibly, and finally the tablets must be baked in order for complete cuneiform communication. Due to the enormous variety of pictograms in the cuneiform script, a strict attention to detail necessitated effective writing. Eventually the evolution of the cuneiform script provided for a quicker writing practice. For example, the number of pictograms was reduced from fifteen hundred to six hundred, and the pictograms transitioned into a phonological alphabet (The). The Sumerian cuneiform language, although not prevalent today, initiated the start of many other written languages. Today the world is home to more than sixty-eight hundred languages, although not all are written (International). In any case, the evolution of written communication begins an interesting topic for describing the conditions of current-day reading and writing. I argue the emergence of technology creates a society dependent on efficiency, ultimately resulting in an illiterate population living in a self-help world. 
The vast improvements of technology seen between the Sumerians of 3000 B.C. and the world of 2013 A.D. highlight the value placed on the concept of efficiency. This process of modern technological improvement can be divided into three main events each showcasing a new, quicker, and more efficient way to engage in literacy. These technological improvements involve the printing press, typewriter, and computer.
The printing press’s invention in the mid fifteenth century allowed for pieces of literature to be produced in mass quantities. Invented by Johannes Gutenberg in Germany, the printing press was the first technology involving movable type. Movable type refers to individual characters on separate sheets of metal that can be rearranged in order to print a combination of words or phrases (Dictionary). With the ease of simply restructuring letters onto a mold books or other pieces of literature could quickly be produced. The printing press replaced the previous method of producing literature. The previous method required a penman to carefully write each character one at a time. Should the penman desire to make multiple copies of his or her work prior to the printing press, an unnecessary amount of time was needed to transfer every character by hand via a pen. The printing press both highlights and initiates the value of efficiency because it reduces the amount of time required to produce a book (Inventor).
Within four hundred years the advent of the typewriter further pushed society into a mindset of efficiency. In an effort to combat his striking employees at the Western Union Telegraph Company, Christopher Sholes set out on a mission to create a machine able to automatically print letters and numbers with the struck of a key. Approved and patented in 1871, Sholes’s typewriter sped up daily life and revolutionized business. Everything from legal rulings to graduation requirements began to rely on the typewriter. While the printing press mainly allowed for effective copying of books, the typewriter allowed for the effective printing of almost all literature mediums, and much of society viewed the typewriter as a means of generating literature quickly and most efficiently (The).
The next technology to emerge, the computer, most thoroughly encompasses the ideals of efficiency in the modern age. Although the advent of the computer cannot be attributed to a specific inventor or pinpointed to a specific time, the emergence of the first commercial computer, the UNIVAC, in 1951 initiated change among society. Businesses and government now trusted their UNIVAC device to gather and organize items such as defense intelligence and payroll applications. The UNIVAC computer gave institutions the tools needed to foster an increasing reliance on efficiency. As computers developed and the Internet materialized into what we have in 2013, society’s reliance on the many flashy attributes of the computer, or more importantly, the Internet, have taken a detrimental effect on the way our brains process information.
From the printing press to the typewriter and all the way to the computer of the Information Age, a dumbing down of society, i.e. illiteracy can be traced as we depend heavily on quick snippets of information.
            Before I begin to argue my point I find it useful to first define literacy.  Literacy can be thought of as a skill acquired through various means and for various reasons that allows for effective written communication between social groups or institutions. Additionally it can be thought of as the formal and fundamental process by which civilized society communicates. Two important factors in these definitions of literacy must be highlighted. First, literacy contains a social component. Literacy scholar and esteemed psychology professor at the Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York Sylvia Scribner says it best when she states, “Literacy abilities are acquired by individuals only in the course of participation in socially organized activities with written language” (Scribner 8). Scribner’s statement refers to the fact that without a social aspect an individual lacks the resources needed to become literate. There would be no need for communication in a world of isolation. Interaction between individuals provides the foundation for which literacy prospers. Second, literacy functions as a means of communication. Communication through literacy allows individuals to transfer information, instructions, ideas, beliefs, and feelings. This transfer of information occurs through language written by one person and read by another. The social aspect and communicative purpose of literacy intertwine with one another and thus provide a clear definition of this abstract topic, allowing for a precise application of the word which will help facilitate the remainder of this essay.